The Feasibility Of Conjoining Christianity And Islam

The purpose of this paper is to describe the feasibility of conjoining Christianity and Islam. There is a current effort in the religious community to join the two faiths together in a religion called Chrislam. This community desires to combine elements from both religions to create a new religion. This may be a difficult task to accomplish because of the nature of both religions. Let us take a look at Christianity first. Christianity had its origins in the first century CE in Palestine. They were first called Christians in Antioch and were identified as such because they emulated the life and teachings of one known as Jesus Christ. This title was a bestowed upon them due to the fact that those outside of the faith considered them to†¦show more content†¦The religion itself has numerous denominations and each denomination has its own interpretation of the Scriptures, whom the followers thereof deem as God inspired and holy. Christianity is the only religion that is really global (Bertil). Christians are divided as to when the birth of the Church actually took place. Some state that the church started when Jesus said that he would build his church on the rock or foundation of his Messiahship. Others state that it was the day of Pentecost with the arising importance of the Holy Spirit as a focal point. Christianity began with the apostles in Jerusalem as a part of Judaism. What is known as the Bible had not been fully developed at that time, so they use the same book as the Jews. Since most of the early Christians were essentially Jewish converts, having the Tanakh made it easy for them to spread their religion. There was a certain difficulty in spreading it beyond Judaism. Jesus spoke Aramaic in the dominant cultural environment was the Greco Roman culture, therefore the Scripture had to be recorded in Greek. Even with this linguistic hindrance this religion exploded and grew very rapidly. It seemed to be much more than a set of laws or commandments, Christians experience something that no other religion offered. It was the solution to many of the world s problems, and it brought people together making them a community. It was based on having a relationship with God, something

Approaches in teaching music at primary level Essay Example For Students

Approaches in teaching music at primary level Essay Approaches in teaching music at primary level Background of Delaware Approach ?mile Jacques-Delaware ( 1850 1950) was a Swiss composer, musician and music educator who developed arrhythmias, a method of learning and experiencing music through movement. According to Delaware (1921), Mile Jacques-Delaware was a multi- faceted performer and pedagogue who designed a method for teaching music and rhythm, and with this method an entire school of thought. In the early twentieth century, Delaware created a three-pronged approach to the study of music using arrhythmias (the study of rhythm), solo ©GE and improvisation. This method of teaching explores the relationship between mind and body and the movement of the body through time and space. According to De Sock (1989:115), College is aimed at developing the sense of musical pitch and tone relations and the ability to distinguish tone qualities. On the other hand Improvisation is aimed at developing the capacity of free invention whilst Arrhythmias is set to give students the feeling for musical rhythm through body movement. In the Delaware arrhythmic plan is the use of the piano on which the teacher improvises cues for the instant body response, n the free expression of the basic music concepts such as dynamics, tempo and pitch. The Delaware method helps a child develop the expressive possibilities of his body in his own way. The Delaware plan expresses individuality. Like Kodiak, Delaware also accepted that rather ear training and rhythmic movement start before instrumental study. The idea here is that what has been synthetically experienced will be more easily translated onto an instrument at a later stage. The Delaware Approach According to Delaware, music is composed of sound and movement. Sound is a form of movement. Delaware sought to unify mind and body in the study of rhythm, which for him consists of movements and breaks in movement. It is because of the connection between sound and movement that he considered certain traits essential in all professional musicians: ear training, rhythm and the ability to externalities inward sensations. As highlighted by Simian (2008), music education facilities around the world advocate Dalliances method, employing it at all age levels, from toddlers through adulthood. While it is commonly thought to be primarily a childrens class, his method was originally designed for college students and remains in use across he globe. Referring to Buchanan (1991), there are three components to the Delaware approach to music education. The arrhythmias section which deals primarily with the exploration of time and duration; the solo ©GE method deals with more concrete concepts. The improvisation portion nurtures creativity and invention in music. These three methods come together to solidify music skills in all areas of music, including music theory. A common way to use the Delaware method in music-theory education is the employment of solo ©GE. This is one of the first things generally taught in Approaches in teaching music at primary bevel 2015 Copy By sailors previous solo ©GE training, use the fixed-do system, referring to C as home. The students begin by standing on one side of the room with their feet on home. As you play the scale, the students take a step forward for every ascending syllable and a step backward for every descending syllable, eventually returning to home. This exercise introduces the syllable names, applies them to different pitches, and also lays the foundation for active listening (ascending and descending). Next, sing groups of three consecutive notes and the students decide whether it was ascending or ascending. Reinforcing the same idea through different movements is an effective way to fortify the concept. According to Delaware (1930), young children do not generally have the musical training t o label intervals, but they are able to at least hear and interpret them. To visually represent the concept of an interval, place cards printed with solo ©GE syllables on the floor. Students can then see that the ascending interval do-FAA is smaller than the interval do-la. The students can step alongside the cards for a visual and kinesthesia representation of the relationship between solo ©GE syllables. After the students gain a physical sense of how the intervals relate to step size, repeat the exercise with the cards removed in order to strengthen the kinesthesia connection. An important aspect of ear training is differentiating between and reacting to a variety of sounds. In order to achieve this understanding, as noted by Simian (2008), one can choose to use a game discussed in Else Finalitys book Rhythm and Movement: Applications of Delaware Arrhythmias. This activity involves passing a ball around a circle while responding to various aural stimuli. Begin with a simple distinction: starting and stopping the music. When the music stops, the student with the ball must freeze until the music begins again. Students are then asked to pass the ball in the opposite direction at the signal of two high notes. Another signal, a low rumbling from the bass of the piano, indicates that the student passing the ball should skip the next person. Children can be encouraged to hear phrase patterns and the occurrence of cadences using the Delaware method. A common activity asks students to draw the music they hear, letting the marks on the paper follow the music. The teacher can demonstrate this with an example, likely a revered line following the shape of the music. The students may begin by making arcs in the air before making any marks on paper. In this exercise students become aware of the direction of the musical line, as well as the resolution at the end of the phrase. Practices based on Delaware methods may be used effectively at the college level in first year theory courses as a way of recognizing chord quality. For example, three students may be used to represent the notes of a major triad. The distance between the first two students is larger than the distance between the second two students, presenting the difference in interval size between major and minor thirds. The middle student, representing the third of the chord, may take a step closer to the first student, the root, demonstrating the difference between major and minor triads. The exercise may also be used to illustrate augmented and diminished chords. Students may be asked to sing the pitches in each example to aurally represent the kinesthesia activity. Chord resolutions may also be represented using a similar physical model. Delaware method explores the connection of mind and body in music through a variety of kinesthesia/aural activities. This method allows students to can benefit from experiencing the music physically in connection with their aural experience. These exercises may be a useful addition to music theory courses at any level, and benefit students of all ages. Basic Features of Arrhythmias (Rhythmic Movements) There are number of basic features of arrhythmias in the teaching and learning of music. A) Although it was originally conceived as an aid to young adult music students, as noted by De Sock (1989), it has been successfully adapted for children. ) Young children may be taught musical concepts such as dynamics, tempo, and pitch through body movement. ) With the Delaware method believing that rhythm is the fundamental force in all art (especially music) use is made of the childs natural loco motor movements as the basis for the rhythmic movement of his method. D) The child learns to distinguish between, and respond instantly to the characteristic rhythms of each of these loco-motor movements, improvised on the piano by the teacher, (walking, marching, running, trotting, skipping, galloping, Jumping and swaying). Eminem was right: what can today's music EssayMusical concepts are learned through singing, chanting, dance, movement, drama and the playing of percussion instruments. Improvisation, composition and a childs natural sense of play are encouraged. The Roof Approach The main thrust in Roof approach to music education is that music, movement and speech form a cohesive whole and that is elemental music. According to De Sock (1989), elemental music is unsophisticated, using small sequence forms (station and rondo), the goal being to bring music within the range of every child, employing the child as a participant rather than as a listener. Carl Roof believed that the music development of children corresponds to the growth of music history and, as such, music teaching must proceed through a series of stages recognizing that: a) Rhythm harmony and therefore precedes harmony Rhythm *Melody ?+ Harmony The rhythmic patterns are experienced through speech patterns taken from the hills roots, thus his own name, vocabulary and nursery rhythms, These rhythmic formulas are then reproduced by clapping, stamping and finally on instruments. Through the combination of rhythm, melody, speech and movement, elemental music becomes more elemental music and never sophisticated. The nature of this elemental music gives the child of any age the opportunity to explore and develop his/her talent creativity. Roofs educational philosophy resulted from, and was influenced by an interest in the work of Delaware and Lab who showed the possibilities of movement and its combination with music. Realizing the endless possibilities of the latter, Roof set about changing the instruction of music into something different from what had, up to then, been accepted as usual. Roof shifted the emphasis from the harmonic to the rhythmic, by disassociating himself from the exclusive use of the piano in physical education, by encouraging students to improvise and compose their own music, and the need arose for instruments which were not only preferably rhythmic, but unsophisticated and easy to learn (De Sock 1989, page). To meet the above requirements a suitable instrumental ensemble had to be invented. Roof developed an instrumental ensemble of mellow, delicate timbre, easy to play and of excellent quality, these instruments are closely related to primitive models or the instruments of a non-western cultures. De Sock (1989) states that Roof instruments, both melodic and non-melodic have added advantage of being designed to require only large muscle movements, although they do require some playing technique, page. However, use of the piano as an accompaniment to surging or instrumental playing is not part of the Roof plan. Playing from memory is encouraged, especially in the early stages, while reading notation is not disregarded ND is introduced early in the course. (Landis and Carder, 1972) coded in De Sock(1989), believes that where as in the traditional study of music, memorization is a culminating activity, Roof felt that singing and playing should not be dependent on musical scores and that memorization be a natural beginning skill. Roof defined the ideal kind of music of children as never music alone but music connected with movement, dance and speech. Musical ideas are consistently explored through this array of active means in increasingly sophisticated ways. The activities are singly or in combination to involve the entire class in learning. Speech The inherent rhythm in the childs native language is an important resource Roofs approach. The rhymes, word games, riddles and poems from the childs heritage offer unlimited possibilities for exploring musical elements. Spoken rhymes may be clapped and perhaps transferred to unpainted percussion instruments. Speech activities are also well suited to the development of literacy and improvisation skills. A close relationship to singing is another important reason for including it in a total music program. Movement The importance of kinesthesia aspect of musical performance is well understood by Roof. Roof acknowledges physical response as the foundation upon which group music making is laid. Roof does not view movement study as an end itself but as another means towards musical and emotional growth. Music and movement are and tempo. Movement in the Roof begins with elemental movement and untrained natural action common to all pupils such as walking running skipping Jumping etc. Hillier are given freedom to move while singing and playing instruments. Instruments Children are fascinated by sound and a few can resist the opportunity to experiment with sound. In an Roof ensemble students will learn to listen appreciate and to help one another in collective musical endeavourers. Sound realization for poems, stories, melodic accompaniment and instrumental pieces are Just a few of the many group music making activities facilitated by musical instruments. His approach is very effective in teaching any instruments to pupils. Characteristics inherent in the Roof philosophy of music education The melodic starting point in pitch training is the natural child chant for Roof, like Kodiak, believed in moving from simple to the complex. Roof expected the children to create station patterns and burdens in atherosclerosis, and he constantly wrote them into the models he provided Motives were taken from the song and used in the introduction and accompaniment of the song Speech patterns were to begin with simple words and progress to complex speech canons The distinctive Roof ensemble of instruments was used. Rhythm is seen as the most vital element in music and as such, is common denominator in speech, movement, singing and improvisation Creative is vitally important in the Roof method The types of music and instruments typically used Folk music and music composed by the children themselves are mostly used in the Roof classroom. The music generated in the Roof Approach is largely improvisational and uses original tonal constructions that build a sense of confidence and interest in the process of creative thinking. Students of the Roof Approach sing, play instruments, and dance alone as well as in groups. Songs are usually short, contain station, are within singing range, can be manipulated to be played in a round or ABA form. Music is chosen with strong nationalistic flavor, being related to folk songs and music of the childs own heritage. Music can also be anything from nursery rhymes to songs that are invented by the children themselves. Roof-Schuler music is largely based on simple but forceful variations on rhythmic patterns. This makes for very simple and beautiful musical forms, which are easily learned by young children, and is also useful for adults and thus it has a universal appeal. Xylophones (soprano, alto, fashionableness (soprano, alto, bass), glockenspiels(soprano and alto),marimbas,castanets, bells, maracas, triangles, cymbals (finger, crash or suspended), tambourines, timpani, gongs, bongos, steel drums and conga drums are UT some of the percussion instruments used in the Roof classroom. Other instruments (both pitched and UN-pitched) that may be used include: The lesson Although Roof teachers use many books as frameworks, there is no standardized Roof curriculum. Roof teachers design their own lesson plans and adapt it to suit the size of the class and the age of the students. For example, a teacher may choose a poem or a story to read in class. Students are then asked to participate by choosing instruments to represent a character or a word in the story or poem. As the teacher reads the story or poem again, students add sound effects by playing the

Kants Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World

Over the years various issues have developed in the world. Things that were once clear cut as either morally wrong or right, have become very contentious. Various philosophers have studied and proposed different ideas on the subject of morality. Kant’s moral philosophy holds that the final result of an action has no value; the value of an action lies on the motivation behind it (Kant, 3). Kant argued that there exists an unconditional and absolute requirement that all other moral obligations are based on.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In order for one to uphold the highest moral law, his or her actions must conform to this requirement which he termed as the categorical imperative (Kant, 15). Kant’s ideology can however be seen as too simplistic when dealing with the modern society characterized by actions tha t cannot be easily categorized as morally right or wrong; those that may be termed as morally ambiguous. Kant, a German philosopher, undertook a study to find the ultimate principle on morality. Kant identified three maxims that would enable one to identify morally right or wrong actions. The first maxim states that every person should act in such a manner that the action would be the right action for other people in similar situations (Kant, 14). The second maxim states that an action is morally right if it treat others not as a means to an end but as an end in themselves (Kant, 29). The final maxim is a summation of the first two and it states that a moral action occurs when one acts as if his actions were setting a universal law that could be used by others under the same circumstances (Kant, 24). When Kant was developing his moral philosophy, the society was mainly religious and culture played a big part in shaping how people acted. The contemporary society is however less gover ned by religion or culture and science (logic) plays a big part on how people make decisions or act. Actions that were previously termed morally inappropriate are under fire with people trying to understand what makes an action morally right or wrong. Kant’s categorical imperative has three formulations that govern all moral action. These formulations can be summed up by the universality principle that states that all actions should be carried out in such a manner that they become universal laws without contradiction (Kant, 30). This formulation in itself is too simplistic for the complicated modern society that we live in. One contentious issue in modern societies has been that of abortion. According to the requirements of categorical imperative, it would be morally wrong for a woman to carry out an abortion.Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Kant argues that the moral value of an action is not based on its results but on its underlying principle and such action should be such that it can be universally adopted. As such, abortion which is mainly carried out to preserve the happiness, well-being or priorities of the woman, goes against this formulation (Denis, 548). Kant also puts forward the principles of good will and duty. According to Kant, good will is that will that is derived from moral laws and has no qualifications (Kant, 5). Kant argued that the expected results of an action are morally neutral and not important when considering morality. He added that good will is the only basis that the value of morality can be recognized. Kant also argued that duty determines whether an action is moral right or wrong. Kant argued that since the moral value of an action does not derive from the expected results, it must then be derived from the principle under which the action is carried out regardless of personal desires or surrounding circumstances (Kant, 7). It is the basic human duty to populate the world and ensure the continuity of life. Abortion goes against this duty thus it must be considered morally wrong. Modern medicine has enabled deformities and complications to be identified before birth. Kant’s argument is ineffective as it would be cruel to give birth to a child who will suffer constantly or to put the life of the mother in jeopardy due to pregnancy complications (Denis, 560). Kant’s morality principle is too simplistic and fails to take into account circumstances that have developed in the contemporary societies. Decision making in modern societies is carried out with regards to a multi-cultured society as a whole. Simplistic ground rules cannot effectively cover all situations under which an action may be undertaken. Abortion is an action involving two parties, the agent and the fetus. The fetus cannot be deemed a rational being hence Kant may propose that laws of morality do not apply to it. However, the fetus is a part of the continuity of life and according to instinct (nature), child birth is a duty common to all. It is thus morally wrong to carry out an abortion as it goes against this duty. Kant’s philosophy cannot cover all aspects found in many contentious issues of the modern world hence it has no place in contemporary society. Works Cited Denis, Lara. â€Å"Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.† Canadian Journal of  Philosophy 37.4 (2007): 547-580Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. Jonathan Bennet. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995 This essay on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World was written and submitted by user Eloise Butler to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Kants Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World

Over the years various issues have developed in the world. Things that were once clear cut as either morally wrong or right, have become very contentious. Various philosophers have studied and proposed different ideas on the subject of morality. Kant’s moral philosophy holds that the final result of an action has no value; the value of an action lies on the motivation behind it (Kant, 3). Kant argued that there exists an unconditional and absolute requirement that all other moral obligations are based on.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In order for one to uphold the highest moral law, his or her actions must conform to this requirement which he termed as the categorical imperative (Kant, 15). Kant’s ideology can however be seen as too simplistic when dealing with the modern society characterized by actions tha t cannot be easily categorized as morally right or wrong; those that may be termed as morally ambiguous. Kant, a German philosopher, undertook a study to find the ultimate principle on morality. Kant identified three maxims that would enable one to identify morally right or wrong actions. The first maxim states that every person should act in such a manner that the action would be the right action for other people in similar situations (Kant, 14). The second maxim states that an action is morally right if it treat others not as a means to an end but as an end in themselves (Kant, 29). The final maxim is a summation of the first two and it states that a moral action occurs when one acts as if his actions were setting a universal law that could be used by others under the same circumstances (Kant, 24). When Kant was developing his moral philosophy, the society was mainly religious and culture played a big part in shaping how people acted. The contemporary society is however less gover ned by religion or culture and science (logic) plays a big part on how people make decisions or act. Actions that were previously termed morally inappropriate are under fire with people trying to understand what makes an action morally right or wrong. Kant’s categorical imperative has three formulations that govern all moral action. These formulations can be summed up by the universality principle that states that all actions should be carried out in such a manner that they become universal laws without contradiction (Kant, 30). This formulation in itself is too simplistic for the complicated modern society that we live in. One contentious issue in modern societies has been that of abortion. According to the requirements of categorical imperative, it would be morally wrong for a woman to carry out an abortion.Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Kant argues that the moral value of an action is not based on its results but on its underlying principle and such action should be such that it can be universally adopted. As such, abortion which is mainly carried out to preserve the happiness, well-being or priorities of the woman, goes against this formulation (Denis, 548). Kant also puts forward the principles of good will and duty. According to Kant, good will is that will that is derived from moral laws and has no qualifications (Kant, 5). Kant argued that the expected results of an action are morally neutral and not important when considering morality. He added that good will is the only basis that the value of morality can be recognized. Kant also argued that duty determines whether an action is moral right or wrong. Kant argued that since the moral value of an action does not derive from the expected results, it must then be derived from the principle under which the action is carried out regardless of personal desires or surrounding circumstances (Kant, 7). It is the basic human duty to populate the world and ensure the continuity of life. Abortion goes against this duty thus it must be considered morally wrong. Modern medicine has enabled deformities and complications to be identified before birth. Kant’s argument is ineffective as it would be cruel to give birth to a child who will suffer constantly or to put the life of the mother in jeopardy due to pregnancy complications (Denis, 560). Kant’s morality principle is too simplistic and fails to take into account circumstances that have developed in the contemporary societies. Decision making in modern societies is carried out with regards to a multi-cultured society as a whole. Simplistic ground rules cannot effectively cover all situations under which an action may be undertaken. Abortion is an action involving two parties, the agent and the fetus. The fetus cannot be deemed a rational being hence Kant may propose that laws of morality do not apply to it. However, the fetus is a part of the continuity of life and according to instinct (nature), child birth is a duty common to all. It is thus morally wrong to carry out an abortion as it goes against this duty. Kant’s philosophy cannot cover all aspects found in many contentious issues of the modern world hence it has no place in contemporary society. Works Cited Denis, Lara. â€Å"Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.† Canadian Journal of  Philosophy 37.4 (2007): 547-580Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. Jonathan Bennet. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995 This essay on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World was written and submitted by user Eloise Butler to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Kants Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World

Over the years various issues have developed in the world. Things that were once clear cut as either morally wrong or right, have become very contentious. Various philosophers have studied and proposed different ideas on the subject of morality. Kant’s moral philosophy holds that the final result of an action has no value; the value of an action lies on the motivation behind it (Kant, 3). Kant argued that there exists an unconditional and absolute requirement that all other moral obligations are based on.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In order for one to uphold the highest moral law, his or her actions must conform to this requirement which he termed as the categorical imperative (Kant, 15). Kant’s ideology can however be seen as too simplistic when dealing with the modern society characterized by actions tha t cannot be easily categorized as morally right or wrong; those that may be termed as morally ambiguous. Kant, a German philosopher, undertook a study to find the ultimate principle on morality. Kant identified three maxims that would enable one to identify morally right or wrong actions. The first maxim states that every person should act in such a manner that the action would be the right action for other people in similar situations (Kant, 14). The second maxim states that an action is morally right if it treat others not as a means to an end but as an end in themselves (Kant, 29). The final maxim is a summation of the first two and it states that a moral action occurs when one acts as if his actions were setting a universal law that could be used by others under the same circumstances (Kant, 24). When Kant was developing his moral philosophy, the society was mainly religious and culture played a big part in shaping how people acted. The contemporary society is however less gover ned by religion or culture and science (logic) plays a big part on how people make decisions or act. Actions that were previously termed morally inappropriate are under fire with people trying to understand what makes an action morally right or wrong. Kant’s categorical imperative has three formulations that govern all moral action. These formulations can be summed up by the universality principle that states that all actions should be carried out in such a manner that they become universal laws without contradiction (Kant, 30). This formulation in itself is too simplistic for the complicated modern society that we live in. One contentious issue in modern societies has been that of abortion. According to the requirements of categorical imperative, it would be morally wrong for a woman to carry out an abortion.Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Kant argues that the moral value of an action is not based on its results but on its underlying principle and such action should be such that it can be universally adopted. As such, abortion which is mainly carried out to preserve the happiness, well-being or priorities of the woman, goes against this formulation (Denis, 548). Kant also puts forward the principles of good will and duty. According to Kant, good will is that will that is derived from moral laws and has no qualifications (Kant, 5). Kant argued that the expected results of an action are morally neutral and not important when considering morality. He added that good will is the only basis that the value of morality can be recognized. Kant also argued that duty determines whether an action is moral right or wrong. Kant argued that since the moral value of an action does not derive from the expected results, it must then be derived from the principle under which the action is carried out regardless of personal desires or surrounding circumstances (Kant, 7). It is the basic human duty to populate the world and ensure the continuity of life. Abortion goes against this duty thus it must be considered morally wrong. Modern medicine has enabled deformities and complications to be identified before birth. Kant’s argument is ineffective as it would be cruel to give birth to a child who will suffer constantly or to put the life of the mother in jeopardy due to pregnancy complications (Denis, 560). Kant’s morality principle is too simplistic and fails to take into account circumstances that have developed in the contemporary societies. Decision making in modern societies is carried out with regards to a multi-cultured society as a whole. Simplistic ground rules cannot effectively cover all situations under which an action may be undertaken. Abortion is an action involving two parties, the agent and the fetus. The fetus cannot be deemed a rational being hence Kant may propose that laws of morality do not apply to it. However, the fetus is a part of the continuity of life and according to instinct (nature), child birth is a duty common to all. It is thus morally wrong to carry out an abortion as it goes against this duty. Kant’s philosophy cannot cover all aspects found in many contentious issues of the modern world hence it has no place in contemporary society. Works Cited Denis, Lara. â€Å"Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.† Canadian Journal of  Philosophy 37.4 (2007): 547-580Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. Jonathan Bennet. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995 This essay on Kant’s Moral Philosophy in the Contemporary World was written and submitted by user Eloise Butler to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Communicate with animal essays

Communicate with animal essays Its so amazing to know that animal can communicate with human. I think a lot of people would surprise to know that, but its not a baseless parlance because we can see an example from Koko who has been taught to use American Sign Language by an institution called Gorilla Foundation. Right now Koko can use more than one thousand signs for food, drink and more. Since we have had a successful example on exploiting Kokos ability, we should have confidence to exploit other animals besides Koko. So, I think we should spend money and time to try to communicate with animals such as Koko the gorilla because knowing the ideas from animals is an amazing investigation; in contrast, it can raise peoples awareness of animal protection and it would probably become a great tourism business within years. The importance of protecting animals can be learnt by communicating with animals. Biologists claim that the difference between animals and human beings is human can analyze and communicate with their fellow creatures. Before the process of evolution, humans were as alike as any kind of ape or gorilla, except for the difference in the brain. After ages and ages, human has become the smartest creature in the earth. As time passed by, people dont remember their position in the nature anymore. We try to improve our living standard and ignore the existence of other animals. Our strength has been shown to the nature by harming other creatures and eventually the natural world is no longer balance now. Some species are in danger of extinction. Did they deserve to be extinct? Why should we deprive them of their right of living on the earth? Didnt the animals and we use to be the same? Thats because they are not able to say no or to fight against us. Accordingly, the animals can be protected if we can communicate with them. Teaching gorilla American Sign Language is the fir ...

Equality before the law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Equality before the law - Essay Example There are various instances when best men are not offered the opportunity to represent their nation, in a democratic way. However, Pericles states that people have adopted the system of office rotation in assuring democracy. As a result, democracy and equal representation of individuals play an imperative role in any government (Thucydides and Woodruff 41). Individuals are offered freedom in order to exercise their rights in a nation that observes representation of the majority. According to Pericles, there must be equal representation of rights and freedom to citizens irrespective of cultural, economic, or social considerations (Thucydides and Woodruff 41). Therefore, people must follow rules and regulations to the letter in order to ensure democracy. The city of Athens represents a nation that has put into consideration myriad political aspects such as democracy, observes individuals’ rights and freedom among others ( Tracy 56). According to the writings, happiness results from individuals being free to carry out any legal activity without infringing others rights and freedom. The city of Athens has a strong force that protects its citizens from external intrusions by neighboring enemies (Thucydides and Woodruff 41). The city of Athens has managed to, effectively; organize its government matters through the adoption of democratic